This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Pazy, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Developmental Approach to Variability in Experience of Self

Graduate School of Business Administration, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978 Israel.

Much more attention has been devoted to the consistency of behavior and experience than to their variable nature. This study aims to reestablish the balance between these two by focusing on variability in experience of self. Three types of variability are defined: (a) phenomenal variability, (b) contextual variation, and (c) polarization in self. The major hypothesis states that as one progresses in level of ego development (as conceptualized by Loevinger, 1976) there is increased variability in self-experience. The empirical methodology is primarily phenomenological in that its various measurement devices look at the experience of the people studied from their own viewpoints and utilize their own personal dimensions of reality construction.

The major hypothesis was strongly confirmed. It was found that ego development and variability of self-experience were positively associated. With higher ego development there was more identification of variability in phenomenal experience of self, more valuing of the quality of variability, more contextual variation, and more polarization in self. It also was found that at lower levels of ego development, variation in the negatively evaluated aspects of the self was more restricted compared to variation in the positively evaluated aspects. Finally, higher levels of ego development were associated with greater recognition of negative aspects of self.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 2, 64-82 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0022167885252007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Greening Joe Kennedy Adams, 1920-1989 Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 1990; 30(2): 44 - 46.

				L. M. Crary, A. Pazy, and D. M. Wolfe Patterns of Life Structure and Variability in Self Human Relations, November 1, 1988; 41(11): 783 - 804. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. J. Schneider The Deified Self: A "Centaur" Response to Wilber and the Transpersonal Movement Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 1987; 27(2): 196 - 216. [Abstract]

				J. J. van der Werff Individual Problems of Self-Definition an Overview, and a View International Journal of Behavioral Development, December 1, 1985; 8(4): 445 - 471. [Abstract] [PDF]