Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/johp

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shelburne, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Carlos Castaneda

If It Didn't Happen, What Does It Matter?

Walter A. Shelburne

5248 Claremont Avenue #32, Oakland, CA 94618.

The significance of Castaneda's account of reported experiences with Don Juan Matus is explored for transpersonal psychology. It is argued that the Don Juan chronicle cannot be a literally true account. Yet, I contend that Castaneda tries to discuss seriolus issues allegorically. On the content level, the message is said to consist of several of Don Juan's teachings. I argue that the manner of presentation of the books as a whole also constitutes a kind of process message in which Castaneda is contending that the issue of whether it literally happened or not makes no fundamental difference to the truth of the account. The metaphorical value of Castaneda's work is held to be ultimately dependent on its link to literal realities and hence the process statement embodied in Castaneda's work is rejected. It is concluded that the Castaneda books yield no reliable knowledge about the nature of trans-personal experience.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 2, 217-227 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0022167887272007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?