This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wilson, S. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The "Real Self" Controversy: Toward an Integration of Humanistic and Interactionist Theory

Department of Sociology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122.

The logical status of the concept "real self" and its usefulness in psychological theory have been topics of some debate in this journal. Critics have argued that this concept stems from Maslow's tendency toward biological reductionism that caused him to ignore the fact, supposedly established by the symbolic interactionists, that the self is ultimately a social-cultural product. In this article, I take steps toward a new view of self-actualization that incorporates insights from both Maslow's theory and the symbolic interactionist perspective. A key point is that the self is a process involving both symbolic and somatic feedback and that, in the ordinary state of consciousness, symbolic self processes are dominant. Observations are provided from the author's study of personal change at Kripalu Ashram to illustrate the importance of social interaction (i.e., socialization processes) in the self-actualization process. Self-actualization involves some of the same processes that symbolic interactionists have observed in other forms of socialization such as becoming a doctor or becoming a deviant. But self-actualization also involves learning to attend to and give meaning to somatic feedback processes so that the person's sense of self ultimately becomes more evenly based on both symbolic and somatic processes.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 39-65 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0022167888281003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. G. Ford The Temperament/Actualization Concept: A Perspective on Constitutional Integrity and Psychological Health Journal of Humanistic Psychology, January 1, 1995; 35(1): 57 - 77. [Abstract]

				R. H. Quinn Confronting Carl Rogers: A Developmental-Interactional Approach to Person-Centered Therapy Journal of Humanistic Psychology, January 1, 1993; 33(1): 6 - 23. [Abstract]

				ThierryC. Pauchant and C. A. Dumas Abraham Maslow and Heinz Kohut: A Comparison Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 1991; 31(2): 49 - 71. [Abstract]

				J. G. Ford Rogerian Self-Actualization: A Clarification of Meaning Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 1991; 31(2): 101 - 111. [Abstract]

				A. C. Bohart Empathy in Client-Centered Therapy: A Contrast with Psychoanalysis and Self Psychology Journal of Humanistic Psychology, January 1, 1991; 31(1): 34 - 48. [Abstract]

				K. J. Shapiro Animal Rights Versus Humanism: The Charge of Speciesism Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 1990; 30(2): 9 - 37. [Abstract]