Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/johp

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/johp

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ford, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Rogerian Self-Actualization

A Clarification of Meaning

J. Guthrie Ford

Department of Psychology, Trinity University, San Antonio, TX 78212.

Carl Rogers's construct of self-actualization changed significantly in its theoretical meaning and usage. In an early period, self-actualization identified Rogers's central motivational construct, which centered on optimal functioning. In later theoretical periods, the tendency toward self-actualization became part of a larger and more dynamic motivational model in which there exists the very good chance that self-actualization will conflict with the realization of optimal functioning-quite a change from its former optimal-functioning meaning. There is evidence that a number of psychologists, even scholars and critics of Rogerian theory, are unclear regarding the accurate meaning and implication of self-actualization in contemporary person-centered theory. This appears to represent a naivet6 about Rogers's two core theoretical works. The goal of this article is to provide a brief review of these with emphasis on the constructs of self-actualization and actualization.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 2, 101-111 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0022167891312011


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
T. G. Patterson and S. Joseph
Person-Centered Personality Theory: Support from Self-Determination Theory And Positive Psychology
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, January 1, 2007; 47(1): 117 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
J. G. Ford
The Temperament/Actualization Concept: A Perspective on Constitutional Integrity and Psychological Health
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, January 1, 1995; 35(1): 57 - 77.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
J. G. Ford
Inherent Potentialities of Actualization: An Initial Exploration
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, July 1, 1991; 31(3): 65 - 88.
[Abstract]