Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/johp

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ford, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Inherent Potentialities of Actualization

An Initial Exploration

J. Guthrie Ford

Department of Psychology, Trinity University, San Antonio, TX 78212.

Biological factors are strongly emphasized in the actualization theories of Maslow and Rogers. Despite this emphasis, functionally nothing is known about the composition of the inherent potentialities of actualization. This study was intended to provide specific information about such potentialities. Toward that end, the study focused on the construct of the personality temperament, a trait having a significant genetic foundation. Using the temperaments of emotionality, activity level, and sociability, it was hypothesized that if these organismic potentialities were not actualized, then maladjustment would result, a deduction from Rogers's theory of personality. Degree of actualization was operationally defined by the discrepancy between retrospective parental recall of the participant's temperament profile as a young child and the college-aged participant's current self-perceptions of these temperaments. All temperament and maladjustment measures were taken by paper-and-pencil inventories, and the hypothesis was confirmed: The greater the child/adult temperament discrepancy, the greater were levels of current maladjustment. The results point to the personality temperament as a useful theoretical construct for understanding inherent potentialities of actualization. The findings are integrated into Maslow's and Rogers's theories, and the relevance of this research to the current crisis of general actualization theory in humanistic psychology is discussed.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 3, 65-88 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0022167891313009
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
D. J. Feeney Jr.
Purposeful Self: Accessing Sensory Motifs as Empowerment in Flow States and Clinical Interventions
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, October 1, 1996; 36(4): 94 - 115.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
J. G. Ford
The Temperament/Actualization Concept: A Perspective on Constitutional Integrity and Psychological Health
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, January 1, 1995; 35(1): 57 - 77.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
W. Mittelman
Openness and Self-Actualization: A Reply to Tobacyk and Miller
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 1992; 32(2): 137 - 142.