Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/johp

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cissna, K. N.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The 1957 Martin Buber-Carl Rogers Dialogue, as Dialogue

Kenneth N. Cissna

Department of Communication, CIS 1040, University of South Florida, Tampa FL 33620-7800.

Rob Anderson

This study offers an understanding of human dialogue by examining a 1957 conversation between two of this century's leading proponents of dialogue, philosopher Martin Buber and psychologist Carl Rogers. The study assumes that this conversation was a dialogue (as those principally involved said it was) and asks what we can learn about dialogue through a study of this one instance. We conduct and report a close analysis of the conversation. For all the difficulties caused by the roles assigned to Buber and Rogers, the presence of two silent audiences, and the interpersonal styles of the men themselves, and despite the encounter not matching some idealized conceptions ofdialogue, this study demonstrates that dialogue is not an 'ideal possibility seldom realized" but a concretely realizable and practical accomplishment.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 1, 11-45 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/00221678940341003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
R. M. Reeves
The Costatement: Objective Evidence for a Science of Subjectivity
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 2006; 46(2): 209 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
S. J. Hanley and S. C. Abell
Maslow and Relatedness: Creating an Interpersonal Model of Self-Actualization
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, October 1, 2002; 42(4): 37 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
M. Cayer
Bohm's Dialogue and Action Science: Two Different Approaches
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 1997; 37(2): 41 - 66.
[Abstract]