Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/johp

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feinstein, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

At Play in the Fields of the Mind: Personal Myths as Fields of Information

David Feinstein, Ph.D.

777 East Main Street, Ashland, OR 97520; dfnet{at}usa.net

The concept that personal myths shape individual behavior in a manner that is analogous to the way cultural myths influence social behavior has been gaining increasing attention over the past two decades. A personal mythology is an internalized model of reality that is composed of postulates about oneself, one's world, and the relationship between the two. These postulates, which address immediate as well as eternal concerns, are both descriptive (furnishing explanations) and instructive (generating motivation). A comprehensive theory of human development that is based on the individual's evolving mythology integrates the biological, psychodynamic, cultural, and spiritual dimensions of experience. This article expands the personal mythology construct, suggesting that personal myths function not only as biochemically coded models of reality but also as fields of information-natural although nonvisible elements of the physical universe-that affect consciousness and behavior. Just as some neurologists have proposed that "mental fields" complement brain activity in unifying experience and some biologists have proposed that "morphic fields" complement the action of the gene in giving form to an organism, the current work proposes that mythic fields complement the physiological bases of consciousness in storing symbolic content and maintaining psychological habits. Implications of this formulation for personal and social change are considered.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 38, No. 3, 71-109 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/00221678980383004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?