Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salzinger, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Loss of the Romantic: Gain for the Science

Kurt Salzinger, Ph.D.

Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY

This article rejects the idea that the crisis in psychology (if crisis there be) is to be explained by the loss of the romantic, by our failing to take advantage of the kind of literary descriptions of personality that our great writers and other artists provide us. Science gains understanding by reducing information to essentials, not by reproducing the complexity of the phenomena it seeks to explain. In defense of the "objective" approach to psychology, it is also necessary to point out that the study of individuals in all their glorious individuality can be accomplished by objective study, particularly by behavior analysis but also by psychologists following other models. Finally, a cold empirical look at the data shows that our intuition is often quite wrong and very rarely to be preferred to objective data when the latter are available.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 39, No. 3, 30-37 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0022167899393004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
N. Krause
The Social Foundation of Religious Meaning in Life
Research on Aging, July 1, 2008; 30(4): 395 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
J. L. Kernes and R. T. Kinnier
Meaning in Psychologists' Personal and Professional Lives
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 2008; 48(2): 196 - 220.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
D. N. Elkins
Empirically Supported Treatments: the Deconstruction of a Myth
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, October 1, 2007; 47(4): 474 - 500.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
A. Pfaffenberger
Different Conceptualizations of Optimum Development
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, October 1, 2007; 47(4): 501 - 523.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
N. Mascaro and D. H. Rosen
The Role of Existential Meaning as a Buffer Against Stress
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 2006; 46(2): 168 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]