Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/johp

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/johp

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rathunde, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Toward a Psychology of Optimal Human Functioning: What Positive Psychology Can Learn from the "Experiential Turns" of James, Dewey, and Maslow

Kevin Rathunde, Ph.D.

Department of Family and Consumer Studies at the University of Utah and Department of Psychology at the University of Utah

Past perspectives on optimal functioning and experience are discussed to inform current epistemological debates in humanistic and positive psychology. It is suggested that William James, John Dewey, and Abraham Maslow initiated "experiential turns" in American psychology, or turns toward immediate subjective experience, to explore questions about what makes life fulfilling and meaningful. Furthermore, these turns toward subjectivity were grounded in philosophical initiatives that challenged traditional, positivistic methods in science. The argument presented here is that a deeper appreciation of the benefits and inherent challenges of adopting an experiential perspective may help build a more unified psychology of optimal human functioning and avoid misunderstandings concerning the role of scientific research in humanistic and positive psychology.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 1, 135-153 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0022167801411008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
J. Sugarman
Practical Rationality and the Questionable Promise of Positive Psychology
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 2007; 47(2): 175 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
B. S. Held
The Negative Side of Positive Psychology
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, January 1, 2004; 44(1): 9 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]