Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/johp

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Making Daemons of Death and Love: Frankenstein, Existentialism, Psychoanalysis

Will W. Adams

Psychology and literature are kindred approaches to the depth dimensions of life. By reading Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein in light of existentialism and psychoanalysis, we may develop a deeper appreciation of the novel and of key psychological phenomena such as death-repression, the return of the repressed, and the daemonic. In evading life’s challenges, Victor Frankenstein makes daemons of four great existential mysteries: death, love, nature, and spirit. His disowned conflicts return to haunt him in the guise of the creature, in his implicit captivation by death, in his alienation from people and nature, and in perversions of authentic spirituality. In contrast, Shelley was able, via Frankenstein, to transform her suffering and hope into a deep, enduring work of art.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 4, 57-89 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0022167801414004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?