Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yanchar, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What Is Psychology About? Toward An Explicit Ontology

Stephen C. Yanchar, Ph.D.

Jack R. Hill,

Commentators have criticized psychology's overemphasis on method and its simultaneous neglect of questions regarding the subject matter and purpose of psychology. This article summarizes four problems that have resulted from the privileging of method, and in each case illustrates how an explicit ontology provides at least partial solutions to these problems. This article also suggests three metatheoretical assumptions based on the thinking of William James that would allow for the establishment of an explicit ontology and that would allow for psychological entities per se to be studied without the threat of biological or other kinds of reductionism. Finally, concerns that may arise in the formation of an explicit ontology are briefly addressed.

Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 43, No. 1, 11-32 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0022167802238811
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Theory PsychologyHome page
J. R. Goertzen
On the Possibility of Unification: The Reality and Nature of the Crisis in Psychology
Theory Psychology, December 1, 2008; 18(6): 829 - 852.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
R. M. Reeves
The Costatement: Objective Evidence for a Science of Subjectivity
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 2006; 46(2): 209 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Theory PsychologyHome page
S. C. Yanchar, E. E. Gantt, and S. L. Clay
On the Nature of a Critical Methodology
Theory Psychology, February 1, 2005; 15(1): 27 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]