Journal of Humanistic Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/johp

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 4, 510-529 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0022167806290210

Humanistic Testing and Assessment

Harris L. Friedman, PhD

Douglas A. MacDonald, PhD

Humanistic psychology’s tradition of controversy regarding the worth of psychological testing and assessment is reviewed. Assessment is defined as a process involving qualitative professional judgments integrating information from various sources and necessarily guiding all professional activities, whether performed explicitly or implicitly. Testing, as delineated from assessment, is just one potential source of assessment input that may provide formally gathered qualitative and/or quantitative information. Arguments against testing and assessment as legitimate activities within humanistic psychological practice are countered, concluding that testing and assessment can be congruent with humanistic ideals when focused on growth, subjectivity, agency, the centrality of the role of both the assessor and client as coparticipants, and a view of the person as a whole with inherent value.

Key Words: testing • assessment • humanistic • psychometric

References

  • Anonymous. (2001). Five postulates of humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41, 3-3.
  • Barlow, D., Hayes, S., & Nelson, R. (1984). The scientist-practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. New York: Pergamon.
  • Beveridge, A. (2002). Time to abandon the subjective-objective divide? Psychiatric Bulletin, 26, 101-103.[Free Full Text]
  • Bohart, A., O’Hara, M., & Leitner, L. (1998). Empirically violated treatments: Disenfranchisement of humanistic and other psychotherapies. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 141-157.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Brown, E. (1972). Assessment from a humanistic perspective. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 9(2), 103-106.
  • Bugental, J. (1964). Psychodiagnostics and the quest for certainty. Psychiatry, 27, 73-77.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Cain, D. (2000). Defining characteristics history, and evolution of human-istic psychotherapies. In D. Cain & J. Seeman (Eds.), Humanistic psychotherapies (pp. 3-54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Cartwright, D., & Mori, C. (1988). Scales for assessing aspects of the person. Person Centered Review, 3, 176-194.
  • Corsini, R. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of innovative therapy. New York: John Wiley.
  • Craddick, R. (1972). Humanistic assessment: A reply to Brown. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 9, 107-110.
  • Crumbaugh, J., & Maholick, L. (1969). Manual for instructions for the Purpose in Life test. Munster, IN: Psychometric Affiliates.
  • Davidson, L. (2000). Philosophical foundations of humanistic psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 28, 7-31.
  • Elliott, R. (2002). The effectiveness of humanistic therapies: A meta-analysis. In D. Cain & J. Seeman (Eds.), Humanistic psychotherapies: Handbook of research and practice (pp. 57-81). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Finn, S., & Tonsager, M. (1997). Information-gathering and therapeutic models of assessment: Complementary paradigms. Psychological Assessment, 9, 374-385.[CrossRef]
  • Fischer, C. (1985). Individualizing psychological assessment. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Fischer, C. (2002). Introduction: Special issue on humanistic approaches to psychological assessment. The Humanistic Psychologist, 30, 3-9.
  • Fischer, C. (2003). Infusing humanistic perspectives into psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43(3), 93-105.[Abstract]
  • Friedman, H. (1983). The Self-Expansiveness Level Form: A conceptualization and measurement of a transpersonal construct. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 15, 37-50.
  • Friedman, H. (2002a). Psychological nescience in a post-modern context. American Psychologist, 57, 462-463.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Friedman, H. (2002b). Transpersonal psychology as a scientific field. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 21, 175-187.
  • Friedman, H., & MacDonald, D. (1997). Toward a working definition of transpersonal assessment. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 29, 105-121.
  • Friedman, H., & MacDonald, D. (Eds.). (2002a). Approaches to transpersonal measurement and assessment. San Francisco: The Transpersonal Institute.
  • Friedman, H., & MacDonald, D. (2002b). Using transpersonal tests in humanistic psychological assessment. The Humanistic Psychologist, 30, 223-236.
  • Friedman, H., & MacDonald, D. (2004). Differentiating assessment from testing. Florida Psychologist, 55(3), 22-23.
  • Garrison, A. (2001). Restoring the human in humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41(4), 91-104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Gordon, N. (2000). Researching psychotherapy, the importance of the client’s view: A methodological challenge. The Qualitative Report, 4. Retrieved April 12, 2002, from http://www.nova.edu/sss/QR/QR4-3/gordon.html
  • Greening, T. (2002). Commentary by the editor. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 42(4), 4-6.[Free Full Text]
  • Honos-Webb, L., & Leitner, L. (2001). How using the DSM causes damage: A client’s report. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41(4), 36-56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Honos-Webb, L., & Leitner, L. (2002). Therapy progress formulation as interventional assessment. The Humanistic Psychologist, 30(1-2), 102-113.
  • MacDonald, D., & Friedman, H. (2002). Assessment of humanistic, transpersonal and spiritual constructs: State of the science. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 42, 102-125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Maloney, M., & Ward, M. (1976). Psychological assessment: A conceptual approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Maslow, A. (1966). The psychology of science. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Mathes, E., Zevon, M., Roter, P., & Joerger, S. (1982). Peak experience tendencies: Scale development and theory testing. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 22(3), 92-108.[Abstract]
  • Meyer, G., Finn, S., Eyde, L., Kay, G., Moreland, K., Dies, R., et al. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128-165.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Miller, D., & Ruskowshi, J. (2003). The Lowenfeld Mosaic Technique: It’s clinical use and potential for facilitating self-actualization. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43(1), 119-130.[Abstract]
  • Nystul, M. S. (1993). The Nystul Turning Point Survey: An assessment instrument to analyze Adlerian tasks of life. Individual Psychology, 49(2), 185-198.
  • Pekala, R. J., Steinberg, J., & Kumar, C. K. (1986). Measurement of phenomenological experience: Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 983-989.
  • Reker, G. T., & Peacock, E. J. (1981). The Life Attitude Profile (LAP): A multidimensional instrument for assessing attitudes toward life. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 13, 264-273.
  • Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Shea, V. (1985). Overview of the assessment process. In C. Newmark (Ed.), Major psychological assessment instruments (pp. 1-10). Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Sheldon, K., & Kasser, T. (2001). Goals, congruence, and positive well-being: New empirical support for humanistic theories. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41(1), 30-50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Shostrom, E. (1966). Personal Orientation Inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Individual Testing Service.
  • Siebert, A. (2000). How non-diagnostic listening led to a rapid "recovery" from paranoid schizophrenia: What is wrong with psychiatry? Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 40(1), 34-58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Stiles, W. (2002). Future directions in research on humanistic psychotherapy. In D. Cain & J. Seeman (Eds.), Humanistic psychotherapies (pp. 605-616). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Sugarman, A. (1978). Is psychodiagnostic assessment humanistic? Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 11-21.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Sweeney, J., Clarkin, J., & Fitzgibbon, M. (1987). Current practice of psychological assessment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 377-380.[CrossRef]
  • Vermeersh, D., & Lambert, M. (2003). A research agenda for humanistic psychotherapy in the 21st century. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43(3), 106-120.[Abstract]
  • Woody, R. (Ed.). (1981). Encyclopedia of clinical assessment (Vol. 1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
T. T. Gorske
Therapeutic Neuropsychological Assessment: A Humanistic Model and Case Example
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, July 1, 2008; 48(3): 320 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?