This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schneider, K. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Deified Self

A "Centaur" Response to Wilber and the Transpersonal Movement

Center for Existential Therapy, 1359 Centre St., Newton Centre, MA 02159.

This article is an existential-phenomenological ("centaur level")¹ response to Ken Wilber's concept of deified or ultimate consciousness. Ultimate consciousness, according to Wilber, is the supreme expression of human awareness. It is the point at which highly developed people (i.e., mystics) totally transcend space and time, and are aware (at once) of all perspectives in the universe. Three areas of this concept are evaluated and questioned: the human capacity to achieve ultimate consciousness, the relevance of ultimate consciousness for human problems, and the final appeal of ultimate consciousness. The author concludes that the concept of ultimate consciousness is (1) presumptuous and most probably unachievable for human beings; (2) even if achievable, irrelevant to people's day-to-day concerns; and (3) ultimately monotonous and uninteresting (if not terrorizing and overwhelming). A plea is made for a more realistic view of consciousness, one in which boundaries permit optimal freedom of expression.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. S. Paulson Wilber's Integral Philosophy: A Summary and Critique Journal of Humanistic Psychology, July 1, 2008; 48(3): 364 - 388. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. N. Elkins Empirically Supported Treatments: the Deconstruction of a Myth Journal of Humanistic Psychology, October 1, 2007; 47(4): 474 - 500. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Pfaffenberger Different Conceptualizations of Optimum Development Journal of Humanistic Psychology, October 1, 2007; 47(4): 501 - 523. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Pope The House of Being Still Stands: Nuclear Holocaust and Human Meaning Journal of Humanistic Psychology, July 1, 2006; 46(3): 303 - 322. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. J. Schneider The Revival of the Romantic Means a Revival of Psychology Journal of Humanistic Psychology, July 1, 1999; 39(3): 13 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Steele Self Beyond Ego: a New Perspective Journal of Humanistic Psychology, January 1, 1998; 38(1): 93 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. M. Fisher A Guide to Wilberland: Some Common Misunderstandings of the Critics of Ken Wilber and His Work on Transpersonal Theory Prior to 1995 Journal of Humanistic Psychology, October 1, 1997; 37(4): 30 - 73. [Abstract]

				R. Walsh and F. Vaughan The Worldview of Ken Wilber Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 1994; 34(2): 6 - 21. [Abstract]

				L. E. Thomas, S. J. Brewer, P. A. Kraus, and B. L. Rosen Two Patterns of Transcendence: An Empirical Examination of Wilber's and Washburn's Theories Journal of Humanistic Psychology, July 1, 1993; 33(3): 66 - 81. [Abstract]

				K. J. Schneider Hitchcock's Vertigo: An Existential View of Spirituality Journal of Humanistic Psychology, April 1, 1993; 33(2): 91 - 100. [Abstract]

				D. G. Richards Dissociation and Transformation Journal of Humanistic Psychology, July 1, 1990; 30(3): 54 - 83. [Abstract]

				M. Washburn Two Patterns of Transcendence Journal of Humanistic Psychology, July 1, 1990; 30(3): 84 - 112. [Abstract]

				K. J. Schneider Infallibility Is So Damn Appealing: A Reply to Ken Wilber Journal of Humanistic Psychology, October 1, 1989; 29(4): 470 - 481. [Abstract]

				M. E. Koltko The Humanized No-Self: A Response to Schneider's Critique of Transpersonal Psychology Journal of Humanistic Psychology, October 1, 1989; 29(4): 482 - 492. [Abstract]